Plaintiff sued Defendants for injuries suffered during an arrest. Both parties called experts and both were subject to exclusion motions.
Gastroenterology Expert Witness Granted in Part and Denied in Part
Plaintiff filed suit against Government for negligence and medical malpractice. Government filed a motion to exclude the testimony of gastroenterology expert witness. The court denied the motion in part and granted the motion in part.
Patent and Trademark Expert Witnesses Granted in Part, Denied in Part
Plaintiff sued defendant for patent and trademark violations. Both hired expert witnesses and both challenged the testimony of each witness.
Medical Toxicologist Expert Witness Testimony Confirmed By Appeals Court
Appellant appealed a decision by the circuit court allowing the expert witness testimony of a medical toxicologist. The appeals court affirmed the lower court opinion
Florida Appeals Court Finds Lower Court Erred in Allowing Some Expert Testimony
Appeals court reviewed many aspects of expert witness testimony that was allowed by the lower court. The appeals court opined that the lower court erred when it allowed some experts to testify.
Two Accident Reconstruction Experts Allowed, Third Expert Allowed in Part.
Plaintiff and defendant were involved in a motor vehicle accident. Three accident reconstruction experts were hired to provide opinions.
Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness Partially Allowed
Plaintiff and Defendant were involved in a motor vehicle accident. Defendants expert was challenged and the court granted and denied the motion to exclude.
Forensic Engineering Expert Witness Testimony Allowed
Plaintiff sued defendant after being injured while operating a salt spreader. The defendant challenged the expert witness testimony of plaintiff’s engineering expert. The judge denied the motion.
Chemistry Expert Witness Testimony Allowed
Defendants challenge the expert witness testimony of chemist. The court disagreed, denying the motion.
2 of 3 Expert Witnesses Not Allowed by Court in Insurance Flood Case
Both parties challenged the expert witness testimonies of 100-year floodplain. 2 out of 3 opinions were excluded by the court