Plaintiff filed suit over an excavation related to a construction project. One company, DBM hired four experts to testify on their behalf. Motions were filed to exclude these experts. The motions were denied.
Plaintiff sued defendant for allegedly copying their residential home design plans. The defendant hired an architecture expert witness and the plaintiff filed a motion to exclude. The court denied the motion in part and granted the motion in part.
Plaintiff sued defendant related to a transfer of funds to an attorney’s trust account. The defendant hired a legal ethics expert witness to assist in his case. The plaintiff filed a motion to exclude, which was denied by the court.
Plaintiff filed a putative class action against the defendant related to automatic enrollment into a toll pay system. Both parties hired marketing expert witnesses, both parties filed motions to exclude, and both motions were denied.
Plaintiffs sued defendant for violation of the Endangered Species Act and hired two experts to assist in their case. The court allowed the veterinary expert witness in full and partially allowed the animals expert witness.
Plaintiff sued his former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Florida Civil Rights act of 1992. The defendant hired a mechanical engineer expert witness to provide testimony. The Plaintiff filed a motion to exclude and the court granted the motion.
Plaintiff sued defendant after she allegedly slipped and fell on a puddle of water. The plaintiff hired a Plumbing & HVAC Expert Witness. The defendant filed a motion to exclude this expert testimony and the court agreed. The testimony was not allowed.
The appellant asked the current court to opine that the circuit court erred when it allowed five physicians to provide expert testimony. The criminal court of appeals affirmed the circuit court convictions.
Plaintiff sued defendants for alleged civil rights violations. The plaintiff hired a police procedures expert witness and the defendants filed a motion to exclude this expert witness testimony. The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part.
A district court excluded the testimony of an oncology and pathology expert witness and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appealed and the circuit court reversed the district court opinion.