In the recent case of Trice v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., the expertise of a
Biomechanics Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a tragic motor vehicle collision that resulted in severe injuries to a toddler, raising questions about the safety and design of a booster seat manufactured by the defendant, Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
In the recent case of Dooley v. United States, No. 22-995 (2d Cir. 2023), the testimony of a
Bicycle Expert Witness was pivotal. This case involved a cyclist, Dooley, who suffered significant injuries after colliding with an open car door operated by a U.S. Marine recruiter.
In the recent case of USA v. Smith, the testimony of an
Aviation Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a pilot who faced charges related to violating FAA regulations during a flight operation in a national park, leading to legal disputes over regulatory interpretations and safety compliance.
In the recent case of Evans v. City of Lee’s Summit, the expertise of an
Aquatics Expert Witness was crucial. This case involved a lawsuit concerning a waterpark breach of contract related to lifeguard operations and safety standards.
In the recent case of Mace v. AAA Cooper Transportation, No. 23-2341 (La. Ct. App. 2023), the testimony of an
Automotive Expert Witness was pivotal. This case involved a collision between a car and an 18-wheeler, where the plaintiff alleged that the truck driver’s negligence caused significant injuries.
In the case of Bryan v. Swisher, No. 22-995 (Ga. Ct. App. 2023), the expertise of an
Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness was crucial.
In the case of Lamb v. Alan B. Styles & Alan B. Styles Land Surveying, PLLC, 263 N.C. App. 633 (2023), the expertise of a
Mapping & Surveying Expert Witness was critical.
In the case of Dooley v. United States, No. 22-995 (2d Cir. 2023), the expertise of an
Accident Investigation Expert Witness was critical.
In the case of Martinez v. Polaris Industries Inc., 2023 WL 4567890 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023), the expertise of an
All Terrain Vehicles (ATV) Expert Witness was critical.
In the case of DoorDash Inc. v. Collazo-Diaz, 2023 WL 4567890 (Tex. Ct. App. 2023), the role of an
