The defendant challenged the standard of care expert witness testimony of anesthesiologist on numerous grounds. The court denied the motion.
In this title insurance dispute involving the construction of a ski resort in Idaho, the plaintiffs challenged the expert witness testimony of two experts. The court granted one motion to exclude in part and denied the other in full.
Both plaintiffs and defendants hired expert witnesses in this proposed class action. In one piece of the case, the defendants filed a motion to exclude the testimony of an expert in marketing. The court denied the motion.
Numerous defendants were indicted on various charges, including racketeering conspiracy. The Government alleges that the defendants were associated with a street gang and hired to experts to help prove their case.
Prisoner with kidney stones sued a nurse who refused to see him, after complaining of severe pain. The defense hired an expert in urology and the plaintiff challenged certain portions of this testimony.
Plaintiffs filed suit against bank arguing that the bank illegally foreclosed on their home. Defendants challenged their expert witness on mortgage servicing and the court granted the motion.
A pediatrician testified as to the medical causation of lead-paint exposure. After a circuit court excluded this testimony, the plaintiff’s appealed. The appeals court reversed this decision.
After a residence fire, the insurer filed suit against the manufacturer of a space heater. The defendant filed a motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff’s explosions expert. The court denied the motion.