Expert Witness Blog
“
In the pivotal case of Virginia International Gateway v. City of Portsmouth, 829 S.E.2d 199 (Va. 2019), the Supreme Court of Virginia addressed the admissibility and impact of testimony from an International Real Estate Valuation Expert Witness in a high-stakes property tax assessment dispute. This case provides critical guidance on the qualifications required for expert witnesses in real estate valuation, especially in matters involving complex, internationally significant properties.
Background and Parties
Virginia International Gateway, Inc. (VIG), the operator of a major marine terminal in Portsmouth, Virginia, challenged the City of Portsmouth’s 2015–2016 real and personal property tax assessments. VIG contended that the City’s assessments substantially exceeded the actual fair market value of its property, resulting in an unjustified tax burden. VIG filed separate applications to correct both the real estate and personal property assessments, which were consolidated for trial.
Role and Methods of the Expert Witness
At trial, VIG retained an International Real Estate Valuation Expert Witness to provide an independent appraisal of the terminal’s fair market value. The expert, a seasoned real estate appraiser with extensive experience in valuing large-scale, internationally relevant properties, conducted a comprehensive analysis using accepted valuation methodologies. These included the income approach, sales comparison approach, and cost approach, all tailored to the unique characteristics of a major maritime facility with global significance.
The expert’s report and testimony aimed to demonstrate that the City’s assessment overstated the property’s value by failing to account for market realities and the specialized nature of the terminal’s operations. The expert’s analysis incorporated international market data, operational constraints, and comparable sales of similar port facilities worldwide.
Court’s Reliability and Daubert Analysis
The trial court, however, refused to recognize the appraiser as an expert, citing the absence of a Virginia real estate appraiser license at the time of trial. As a result, the expert’s testimony was excluded from evidence. The trial court ultimately dismissed both of VIG’s applications, finding that VIG had failed to meet its burden of proving that the assessments were excessive.
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Virginia conducted a thorough analysis of the admissibility of expert testimony in real estate valuation cases. The Court held that a real estate appraiser need not be licensed in Virginia to qualify as an expert witness in a tax assessment dispute. The Court emphasized that the key consideration is the expert’s knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, not state licensure. The exclusion of the expert’s testimony was deemed an abuse of discretion, as the appraiser’s international expertise and valuation methodologies were both relevant and reliable under Virginia law.
Impact of the Expert Testimony on the Outcome
The Supreme Court reversed the trial court’s judgment with respect to the real estate assessment, remanding the case for further proceedings and instructing the lower court to admit and consider the expert’s testimony. The Court affirmed the trial court’s decision regarding the personal property assessment, finding that VIG had not overcome the presumption of correctness for that portion of the assessment.
This decision underscores the critical role that an International Real Estate Valuation Expert Witness can play in complex property tax disputes, particularly those involving properties with international dimensions. The case establishes that courts must focus on the substance of an expert’s qualifications and the reliability of their methods, rather than formal licensure requirements, when determining admissibility. The Supreme Court’s ruling ensures that parties in high-value, globally significant real estate disputes can present the most qualified expert testimony available, regardless of state licensing technicalities.
Virginia International Gateway v. City of Portsmouth, 829 S.E.2d 199 (Va. 2019)“